Skip to content
rutahsa Latin America · travel reference

About the Record: What This Site Is, and How It Is Checked

Rutahsa covers travel in Latin America subject by subject: the Guatemalan highlands first and most densely, then Venezuela's Gran Sabana, the Peruvian sierra, and the countries in between. Each page sets out what a place is, where it sits, what reaching it involves, and when that is possible.

Lake Atitlán from the north shore, with the volcanoes behind the lakeside villages
The kind of subject covered here · Lake Atitlán, Guatemalachensiyuan, CC BY-SA 4.0

How figures are handled

Some things do not change: an altitude, a founding date, the structure of a weave. Others do, and they are the ones that decide a trip: park fees, guide requirements, road surfaces, seasons of access, permit caps. Where a page states one of the second kind, it says when that was last checked, and the date sits in the footer of the page rather than in a banner at the top.

That date is the honest limit of the page. It means the figure was verified against a park authority or a published schedule on that day, and it does not mean anyone has looked since. Nothing here is a live feed, and a page approaching a year old should be read as a good starting point that still wants one phone call.

What is covered, and what is not

Coverage is deepest where the terrain and the practicalities are hardest to work out from a distance: the Guatemalan highlands, the tepui country of south-eastern Venezuela, and the Inka engineering of the Peruvian sierra. Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Bolivia appear where they connect to those, rather than as complete country guides.

There are no hotel rankings here, no booking links and no sponsored placements. Where a page names an operator requirement, whether a mandatory guide, a permit cap or a park rule, it is because the rule exists and not because somebody sells the service.

The gaps are gaps rather than judgements. A place that is not covered yet is usually one where there is nothing to add beyond what a map already tells you, or one where the practical detail changes too fast to be worth publishing at this depth.

Sources, and photographs

The durable material comes from published archaeology, ethnography and geography. The changeable material comes from the bodies that set it: national park authorities, the agencies that issue permits, and the operators licensed to run the trips that require a guide. Where accounts disagree, the page says so rather than picking the tidier number.

The photographs are openly licensed, mostly from Wikimedia Commons, and every one of them carries its author and licence in the caption. The photograph credits page lists them all with links back to the original files.

How a page is put together

Every subject page answers the same four questions in the same order, because the order is what makes two pages comparable: what the place is, where it sits, what reaching it involves, and when that is possible. After those come the specifics that only apply to that subject, and then a set of questions that people actually ask about it.

The figures in the header of each page are the ones that most often decide whether a place fits a trip: an altitude, a walking time, a permit cap, a market day. They are there so that a reader can rule a page in or out in a few seconds without reading it, which is the honest use of a reference and the reason none of them is hidden behind a paragraph of preamble.

Cross-links between pages are there where one subject genuinely explains another, not to move readers around the site. A page about a market links to the page about the cloth sold in it because the second answers a question the first raises.

Why some figures name an authority and others do not

Where a fee, a permit rule or a closure can be traced to the body that sets it, the page names that body rather than only the number. A park fee set by a forestry institute, a site tariff set by a national antiquities institute, an access closure decided by a disaster authority on the strength of a volcanology bulletin: naming the source is what lets a reader check the figure after this page has gone stale, which it will.

Where no authority publishes the number, the page says that instead of supplying one. Some trailhead fees in this region are collected locally and quoted differently by every operator who lists them, and in those cases the useful sentence is not a figure but the advice to confirm whether a tour price includes it. A precise-looking number with nothing behind it is the failure mode this site is trying to avoid.

The same rule covers disputed history. Where published counts of an event disagree, the page reports that they disagree rather than choosing the tidiest one, because the disagreement is usually itself informative.

Corrections

If something here is wrong or has gone out of date, the corrections page explains how to say so, and gives the address to say it to. Corrections about changeable conditions are the most useful kind, particularly when they say when you were there.

About this site

Who writes this site?

It is written and maintained as an editorial reference rather than under bylines. No page here reports personal experience of a place, and nothing on the site is a first-hand trip account: the material is compiled from park authorities, published sources and official schedules, and the check date on each page says when that was last done.

Does this site sell anything, or take commission?

No. There are no booking links, no affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no advertising. Where a page names a guide requirement or a permit cap it is because the rule exists, not because somebody sells the service.

Where do the photographs come from?

From openly licensed sources, mostly Wikimedia Commons. Every photograph carries its author and licence in the caption, and the photograph credits page lists all of them with links to the original files.

How current are the fees, permits and seasons?

Each page carries the date its changeable figures were last checked, printed in the footer. A figure that is older than the last season it applies to should be treated as an indication rather than a quotation, and confirmed with the park or operator before it decides anything.

Why are prices given as ranges, or left out?

Because park fees and transport prices in this region change more often than a static page can follow, and a precise figure that is two seasons out of date is worse than a range. Where an exact fee matters, the page says who sets it so it can be checked at source.

What happens to a page when something changes?

The page itself is corrected and its check date is moved forward. Where a figure turns out to be seasonal rather than simply wrong, the page says so instead of being quietly edited to whichever value is current.